6 Comments

The Purpose of Conflict

BTCLehi



A few days ago, I was in a chat room with a diverse group of intelligent people.  I’d like to share a couple stories I hope will yield some insight into book publishing and online networking.

In this chat room, I noticed that there were some people with what seemed like irreconcilable difference.  I won’t go into details, but two people with very different perspectives had an argument.  Emotions got involved, ignore buttons were used, and they parted ways for the night.

I don’t know if they’ll ever reach an agreement.  In fact, I don’t think it’s important that they do.  Some people just aren’t compatible to work together. I learned that their conflict was necessary to discover that they likely can’t work together in any meaningful capacity.

My other story deals with the book publishing industry.  Long after the first big argument, I ran into a smaller argument about the book industry.  I was trying to demonstrate that books are a means to an end, which plays a big role in where the industry is going.

One of the points of contention was over people making money with books.  I was trying to point out that because of torrents and market saturation, books are not a good way to make money in and of themselves.

The conflict in the argument came when this person tried to argue that people would still be able to make money, selling books, because of all of the safeguards in place to protect from piracy.

The argument didn’t address my original point that books are not a good means to making money in and of themselves.  Media saturation would still keep authors from being noticed.

The person I was arguing with was focused on a minute detail while I was focused on the bigger picture.  While not necessarily an irreconcilable difference, it was telling of how each of us communicates.

My point in all of this is to demonstrate that it’s important to have conflict.  We need it to qualify our colleagues.

It also demonstrates how different people communicate.  Be mindful of your communication style. Take the Myers-Briggs personality test to see what I mean.

Does anyone have any stories they’d like to share about their conflicts?  What did you learn?

  • http://www.facebook.com/XiaoGui17 Vanessa Hutcheson

    INTJ and ESFP chatting… you know they’re not in the same ballpark. ;) Thank goodness the NT recognized this and terminated the dialogue.

  • Chantalrd

    Good job. I like what you wrote.

    I don’t like conflict, and find myself shutting down when there is conflict.I avoiding people when there is conflict.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lehi-Drew/754548466 Lehi Drew

    Thanks for the reply. Are there times when you embrace conflict?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lehi-Drew/754548466 Lehi Drew

    Pretty much. Sometimes the only common ground is agreeing to disagree.

  • http://twitter.com/b160allen Brandon R Allen

    After spending nearly 10 years in the corporate world on various positions you realize that conflict can be a great tool for a number of different reasons, particularly respect. People respect other people who have boundaries and their own ideas.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=605605636 Kyle McNeil

    Hey Lehi – I credit you for writing this, it’s an important area. Conflict is a natural thing. Like Brandon says it helps establish respect. Sometimes too through the process, it helps people get clear about where they stand.

    When ego gets in the way, and the approach is something other then win/win … that’s when it gets nasty.

    And frankly I don’t believe that “arguing” gets anyone anywhere. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been in a fair share in my life and I’m no saint.

    What I did learn though … is when argument happens and both parties shut off listening (and empathy) you now have 2 monologues … there’s no true communication and it’s just people blowing steam!

    It’s b/c both parties are focused on winning … and not losing.

    The situations that get resolved are the ones where at least one party wants both sides to “win”.

    And time and time again … since I’ve learned this, I’m finding “we are more on the same page then we think we are” … it’s just that people have their armor up to “win the battle” …

    How about we drop the armor, our agenda and listen. Some trust would go a long way to get things moving. Understanding is a powerful way to create trust.

    That’s my perspective. As always I’m open to learning. At the same time, this is deeply true for me.

    Thanks Lehi — you obviously hit something of importance to me …

    Kyle

WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera