The Big Bully on the Playground
If youâ€™re a self-published author, especially if youâ€™re using print-on-demand (POD), youâ€™re probably aware of the story circulating the Internet alleging that Amazon.com is using bullying tactics. Those are the nice reports. Other reports and comments allegedly accuse Amazon of trying to create a monopoly, which violates anti-trust laws.
How is Amazon.com supposed to be doing this? Well, Amazon has decided, allegedly, that authors and publishers using POD (especially those who print through Lightning Source, purported to be the largest printer of POD books around) should begin using BookSurge to print their books. BookSurge is Amazonâ€™s POD arm.
If you do not port your titles to BookSure and/or sign up to have all your future books printed via BookSurge, Amazon has announced, allegedly, that it will remove the â€œbuyâ€ button from your bookâ€™s Amazon page. To date, a number of publishers have already had this happen.
I received news of this through Twitter. A good friend posted a link to Angela Hoyâ€™s detailed note about this issue, and I hopped over to read it. Angela said, â€œSome Print on Demand (POD) publishers are privately screaming â€œMonopoly!â€ while others are seething with rage over startling phone conversations theyâ€™re having with Amazon/BookSurge representatives.â€ She claims weâ€™re all afraid. But that doesnâ€™t seem to me to be the case, as over 80 blogs have been taking Amazon to task over this and continue to draw comments from loyal readers and followers.
Over at Publishing For Profit, the idea is that Amazon is doing this for â€œ. . . a whole bunch of possible reasons, including the recent trend toward non-trade discounts on some types of books sold through LSI/Ingram, a grab for vertical integration and larger market share in an evolving marketplace, or a misguided bit of executive hubris.â€
Thatâ€™s a mouthful, if you ask me.
I wrote about this on our publishing blog, and it just seems to me that Amazon knows itâ€™s the 800-pound gorilla in the room and that it can run the POD world if it chooses to do so. It seems that they donâ€™t really care about the little guy. What they seem to care most about is making profits and, if they can lean on small press publishers and self-published authors, they will.
Over at Anita Campbellâ€™s Small Business Trends blog, she writes, â€œAmazon May be on Receiving End of Internet Justiceâ€ and goes on to say, â€œThe news hit the Web a few days ago. Authors and smaller publishers that rely on print-on-demand technology as part of their business models, are not amused. In fact, theyâ€™re outraged, and the Internet is abuzz with the issue. Isnâ€™t it ironic that a company that owes its growth and market power to the Internet may see the other end of Internet justice, as word-of-mouth spread by the Internet turns against Amazon?â€
Anita links to Pearlsong Press, which writes, â€œBully on the Block?â€ They say, â€œSome in the industry are referring to it as an â€˜offer you canâ€™t refuse.â€™ Terms like â€˜strongarm tacticsâ€™ and â€˜bullyingâ€™ are also being used.â€ The Pearlson Press article then goes on to explain how POD changes the dynamics of publishing, especially at the money end. According to them, â€œMore than 50 percent of all academic presses utilize print-on-demand printing,â€ citing The Wall Street Journal. And they say that, â€œEven the big commercial publishing houses use print-on-demand technology to print â€˜backlistâ€™ titles.â€
Overall, many writers and bloggers agree that Ingram has a hand in this, somehow. Itâ€™s the largest wholesale book distributor I know of, and it carries Lightning Source books for many POD publishers. Ingram and LS are definitely joined at the hip. Certainly Lulu, one of the biggest POD firms in the country, uses Lightning Source, as does Angela Hoyâ€™s POD company, Booklocker. And yet, Lulu CEO Bob Young has not chimed in on this issue. I went to the Lulu forums and read notes from authors begging him to join the fight, but so far I have only found a WSJ quote saying something about publishers needing to comply if they still want to sell via Amazon. Say what, Bob? Even the Lulu blog is silent on the issue.
Letâ€™s end with some quotes from this blog, Self Publishing, where the post is very articulate and pointed: â€œA New Amazon Mandate? Say it ainâ€™t so, Jeff.â€ (Angela Hoy is keeping a list of sites that post on this. Today, March 31st, she says April 1st is the cut-off for many POD publishers. Either they comply, or their books lose the â€œbuyâ€ button.) Morris Rosenthal at Foner Books (the underlying company for this Self Publishing blog) says, â€œWhatâ€™s troubling about this and other stories Iâ€™ve heard of from Lightning Source publishers is that BookSurge reps have had the gall to hide behind the claim of better serving Amazon customers.â€ And then, â€œBy allegedly attempting to strong-arm publishers into using Booksurge, which is a losing financial proposition for many publishers compared to staying with their current printer, Amazon may well make a few more books available for Prime shippingâ€¦But Amazon is a huge corporation with plenty of room for mistakes, and Iâ€™d like to believe that some rogue operators in their publishing division have been overstepping their responsibilities.â€
One can only hope.
To join in the conversation and to support small presses that use POD, hop over and check out this petition to put a stop to this ridiculous policy: â€œStop the BookSurge Monopolyâ€
Subscribe To Beneath The Cover's Blog
Join the many publishers and authors who already get their updates sent straight to their inbox. Enter your email address below: